一个美国网友对核电站的评价:
HaruMohri
This accident have revealed that It is still dangarous in Nuclear prower plant.
Japan is thought to have the one fo the higest technology in nuclear technology, But even Japan has not enogh safe technology. Even though, some people claim nuclear plant is safe, because this Fukusima accident will be analyzed and they will easily to prevent another accident like this case.
The other coutries, especially developing countries may be more dangerous than Japan. Natural disasters like as eartrh quakes and hurricanes and the incident by human errors also can happen everywhere in the world.
At the moment, nobody can predict how biggest accidents beyond prediction will occur in the future. Three mile in the US, Chrnobille in Russia, and this Fukusima accident have indicate us that we have to consider the safety first, the economy second. Science and technology , off course, have been progressing, but it takes long time and tremendous efforts to the assurance of Nuclear. Huge nuclear pollution will last long for hudred years.
Why do goverment and people think Nuclear weapons more dangerous than Nuclear plants? less
40 minutes ago | Like (1) | Report abuse
这个事故说明,核电站还是有危险的。日本被认为有比较高端的核能技术,但他们还没有足够安全的技术,即使这样,有些人还声称核电站是安全的,因为Fukusima事故会被分析研究,他们就可以避免再发生这样的情况。在其它国家,特别是发展中国家,可能比日本更危险,像地震和飓风这样的自然灾难在世界各地都可能发生。
现在,没有人能预知将来会有多大的事故发生。美国的three mile,俄罗斯的Chrnobille,还有日本的Fukusima事故告诉我们,我们必然考虑安全第一,经济第二。当然,科学技术会不断发展,但这要花很长时间的努力。巨大的核污染会持续影响几百年。
|